Just to alert you that I have a new update on Iskandar Malaysia, released by the Institute of Southeast Asian Studies. This was co-written with Vasiliki (PhD scholar at Cambridge University), who has been a Research Associate on a bunch of papers and studies.
ISEAS has released an abridged version of our update: http://bit.ly/1DX0Oa4, written by Guest Writers Khor Yu Leng and Vasiliki Mavroeidi and titled “Iskandar Malaysia Labours to Develop”.
Key topics:
Extracts from full report:
The most vociferous public concerns have come from former Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad. In his personal blog, he worried the radical changes in the landscape of the “new Johor Bahru” (in Malay: Johor Bahru Baru) would not see Malays from the city or nearby villages occupy the many skyscrapers in the planning. In a jibe at selling out to foreigners, Mahathir noted that Singapore was sold in 1819 to the British for only 60,000 Spanish dollars by the Temenggong (governor acting for the Sultan of Johor) when the island was only inhabited by a few fishermen. He also pointed out that new citizens could become a political force in Johor and affect the balance with ethnic Malay voters. Mahathir cites a Malay proverb that development may come with a hefty price (“Yang penting ialah Malaysia menjadi negara maju walaupun ayam dikepok mati kelaparan dan itik di air mati kehausan”): locals would suffer in their own bountiful land due to the influx of outsiders (Mahathir 2014). In reaction from the political opposition, PAS vice-president Salahuddin Ayub said: “We hope that former prime minister Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad will give further explanations on the fight to prevent the Iskandar region from being taken over by foreigners,… because it involves the issue of national security which the Iskandar project seem to have threatened” (Malaysia Chronicle, 14 July 2014).
ISEAS has released an abridged version of our update: http://bit.ly/1DX0Oa4, written by Guest Writers Khor Yu Leng and Vasiliki Mavroeidi and titled “Iskandar Malaysia Labours to Develop”.
Key topics:
- Iskandar Malaysia located in southern Johor is now marketed as the northern adjunct of Singapore and for transboundary living. 40% of investments were in the real estate sector.
- High profile, large-scale property development projects by China-based companies has been the latest phenomenon. Country Gardens is the most noted.
- The role of the Sultan of Johor in business is figuring high.
- Another issues is the recently increased cost of vehicles crossing the border.
Extracts from full report:
The most vociferous public concerns have come from former Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad. In his personal blog, he worried the radical changes in the landscape of the “new Johor Bahru” (in Malay: Johor Bahru Baru) would not see Malays from the city or nearby villages occupy the many skyscrapers in the planning. In a jibe at selling out to foreigners, Mahathir noted that Singapore was sold in 1819 to the British for only 60,000 Spanish dollars by the Temenggong (governor acting for the Sultan of Johor) when the island was only inhabited by a few fishermen. He also pointed out that new citizens could become a political force in Johor and affect the balance with ethnic Malay voters. Mahathir cites a Malay proverb that development may come with a hefty price (“Yang penting ialah Malaysia menjadi negara maju walaupun ayam dikepok mati kelaparan dan itik di air mati kehausan”): locals would suffer in their own bountiful land due to the influx of outsiders (Mahathir 2014). In reaction from the political opposition, PAS vice-president Salahuddin Ayub said: “We hope that former prime minister Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad will give further explanations on the fight to prevent the Iskandar region from being taken over by foreigners,… because it involves the issue of national security which the Iskandar project seem to have threatened” (Malaysia Chronicle, 14 July 2014).